Bug#687694: version incompatibility

[brian.thomason at gmail.com]

Hi,

I'm happy to make whatever changes are necessary to this package, but I'm
not sure what is gained by providing Breaks for every potential package
affected by a bouncycastle upgrade.  It seems to me more proper that if
package X depends on bouncycastle = version Y (which appears to be the case
here) that package should then reflect it, rather than putting X number of
Breaks in the bouncycastle package itself and having to expand that list
each time a new package enters the pool that depends upon it.

Best regards,

-Brian
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-java-maintainers/attachments/20121004/c35a3705/attachment.html>