[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#888903: Bug#888903: Bug#888903: jsbeautifier, node-js-beautify: both ship /usr/bin/js-beautify

[Jérémy Lal]

Le jeu. 31 janv. 2019 à 09:30, Paolo Greppi <paolo.greppi at libpf.com> a
écrit :

> Il 31/01/19 01:15, Jérémy Lal ha scritto:
> > ...
> > Hi,
> >
> > i find it funny that no one even tried to solve this bug:
> > both packages (python-jsbeautifier, node-js-beautify)
> > have the same upstream !
> > The solution here is to provide two dpkg-alternative to
> > /usr/bin/js-beautify.
> >
> > It's blocking postcss, it would be nice to quickly fix this.
> >
> > Jérémy
>
> I had proposed an ever quicker fix:
>
> https://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-javascript-devel/2019-January/030590.html
> which is still on my todo list. What do you think of that ?
>

okay then it seems it's going to be that way :|
Do you want me to sponsor that upload ?



> A more complex (but nicer) alternative would be to have single source
> generate both the js and python package.
>
> Currently they have the same homepage, but different upstream tarballs.
> python-jsbeautifier watches pypi:
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/debian/python-jsbeautifier/blob/debian/master/debian/watch
> whereas we watch github:
> https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-js-beautify/blob/master/debian/watch
>
> Another difficulty is that python-jsbeautifier is at version 1.6.4,
> whereas node-js-beautifyis at 1.7.5.
> In any case both packages could be updated to 1.8.9 which is the current
> non-beta version.
>

Okay. Maybe for buster+1 ?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-javascript-devel/attachments/20190131/5ea1d472/attachment.html>