[Pkg-javascript-devel] Uglify-js vs terser: plan for bullseye

[Jonas Smedegaard]

Quoting Pirate Praveen (2019-07-27 20:15:48)
> While updating webpack to 4.0, I came to know terser is a drop in 
> replacement for uglify-js and uglify-es (both unmaintained now).
> 
> Should we target moving to a single minifier for bullseye?
> 
> Advantage is less maintenance (less number of packages to maintain) 
> and it seems terser is in a better position compared to other minifier 
> projects.

terser and uglify-js are competing projects.

I am unaware of any conclusive information on either of them being 
superior to the other for all(!) use-cases.

I intend to maintain both projects, unless convinced otherwise.


 - Jonas

-- 
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: signature
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-javascript-devel/attachments/20190728/3cb30afc/attachment.sig>