[Pkg-javascript-devel] debian-js at lists.debian.org, nodejs transition

Jérémy Lal kapouer at melix.org
Fri Oct 18 23:55:57 BST 2019


Le ven. 18 oct. 2019 à 21:18, shirish शिरीष <shirishag75 at gmail.com> a
écrit :

> at bottom :-
>
> On 18/10/2019, Jérémy Lal <kapouer at melix.org> wrote:
> > Actually you already have that information, but let me be clear about it:
> > - nodejs transitions in same Major versions are uncoordinated - they are
> > supposed to go well.
> > - nodejs transitions to other Major version - 12 here - are going to
> cause
> > troubles (even if not that much) so will be announced.
> >
> > Does this answer your question?
> >
> > Le ven. 18 oct. 2019 à 20:57, shirish शिरीष <shirishag75 at gmail.com> a
> > écrit :
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I have been observing nodejs for quite sometime and also seeing the
> >> archives, but the archives do not tell what is happening.
> >>
> >> While as Utkarsh shared in at
> >>
> >>
> https://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-javascript-devel/2019-October/036552.html
> >>
> >> From an outsider one is unable to know what is going to happen and how.
> >>
> >> For e.g. there is an automated nodejs transition which doesn't tell
> >> what is going to transition and when except for these lines -
> >>
> >>     Affected: .depends ~ /\b(libnode72|libnode64)\b/
> >>     Good: .depends ~ /\b(libnode72)\b/
> >>     Bad: .depends ~ /\b(libnode64)\b/
> >>
> >> Now how does a person who isn't a nodejs expert know what is going to
> >> happen and when ?
> >>
> >> For e.g. -
> >>
> >> $ node --version
> >> v10.15.2
> >>
> >> While apt-cache policy tells of three versions of nodejs -
> >>
> >> $ apt-cache policy nodejs
> >> nodejs:
> >>   Installed: 10.15.2~dfsg-2
> >>   Candidate: 10.15.2~dfsg-2
> >>   Version table:
> >>      12.10.0~dfsg-2 100
> >>         100 http://cdn-fastly.deb.debian.org/debian experimental/main
> >> amd64 Packages
> >>      10.16.3~dfsg-1 100
> >>         100 http://cdn-fastly.deb.debian.org/debian unstable/main amd64
> >> Packages
> >>  *** 10.15.2~dfsg-2 900
> >>         900 http://cdn-fastly.deb.debian.org/debian testing/main amd64
> >> Packages
> >>         100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
> >>
> >> Now should we be waiting for nodejs 10.16.3 or 12.10 I don't know. As
> >> there is no transition bug to follow I cannot even know when the
> >> transition is going to start or not. Could somebody help in untangling
> >> this mess.
> >>
>
>
> Hi Jeremy,
> It actually does not. What I forgot to mention is also this info. that
> I see on tracker.debian.org/nodejs  .
>
>   excuses:
>
>     Migration status for nodejs (10.15.2~dfsg-2 to 10.16.3~dfsg-1):
> BLOCKED: Maybe temporary, maybe blocked but Britney is missing
> information (check below)
>     Issues preventing migration:
>     missing build on mips64el
>     missing build on mipsel
>

That's the reason why it's not going to testing.
I started investigating... up to the point non-debian work took over my
time.
Feel free to give some help !


>     Additional info:
>     Piuparts tested OK -
> https://piuparts.debian.org/sid/source/n/nodejs.html
>     Should wait for tests relating to nodejs 10.16.3~dfsg-1, but
> forced by elbrus
>     autopkgtest for node-unicode-data: amd64: Test in progress
>     37 days old (needed 5 days)
>     Not considered
>
> Now do we need for auto-icu migration to happen and complete which we
> don't know will start when, as libicu65 is in experimental atm :(
>

I'm not sure it's related to icu. But i might be wrong. That's another
issue in any case.

Jérémy
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-javascript-devel/attachments/20191019/430d355d/attachment.html>


More information about the Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list