[Pkg-javascript-devel] debian-js at lists.debian.org, nodejs transition
shirish शिरीष
shirishag75 at gmail.com
Fri Oct 18 20:18:04 BST 2019
at bottom :-
On 18/10/2019, Jérémy Lal <kapouer at melix.org> wrote:
> Actually you already have that information, but let me be clear about it:
> - nodejs transitions in same Major versions are uncoordinated - they are
> supposed to go well.
> - nodejs transitions to other Major version - 12 here - are going to cause
> troubles (even if not that much) so will be announced.
>
> Does this answer your question?
>
> Le ven. 18 oct. 2019 à 20:57, shirish शिरीष <shirishag75 at gmail.com> a
> écrit :
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have been observing nodejs for quite sometime and also seeing the
>> archives, but the archives do not tell what is happening.
>>
>> While as Utkarsh shared in at
>>
>> https://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-javascript-devel/2019-October/036552.html
>>
>> From an outsider one is unable to know what is going to happen and how.
>>
>> For e.g. there is an automated nodejs transition which doesn't tell
>> what is going to transition and when except for these lines -
>>
>> Affected: .depends ~ /\b(libnode72|libnode64)\b/
>> Good: .depends ~ /\b(libnode72)\b/
>> Bad: .depends ~ /\b(libnode64)\b/
>>
>> Now how does a person who isn't a nodejs expert know what is going to
>> happen and when ?
>>
>> For e.g. -
>>
>> $ node --version
>> v10.15.2
>>
>> While apt-cache policy tells of three versions of nodejs -
>>
>> $ apt-cache policy nodejs
>> nodejs:
>> Installed: 10.15.2~dfsg-2
>> Candidate: 10.15.2~dfsg-2
>> Version table:
>> 12.10.0~dfsg-2 100
>> 100 http://cdn-fastly.deb.debian.org/debian experimental/main
>> amd64 Packages
>> 10.16.3~dfsg-1 100
>> 100 http://cdn-fastly.deb.debian.org/debian unstable/main amd64
>> Packages
>> *** 10.15.2~dfsg-2 900
>> 900 http://cdn-fastly.deb.debian.org/debian testing/main amd64
>> Packages
>> 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
>>
>> Now should we be waiting for nodejs 10.16.3 or 12.10 I don't know. As
>> there is no transition bug to follow I cannot even know when the
>> transition is going to start or not. Could somebody help in untangling
>> this mess.
>>
Hi Jeremy,
It actually does not. What I forgot to mention is also this info. that
I see on tracker.debian.org/nodejs .
excuses:
Migration status for nodejs (10.15.2~dfsg-2 to 10.16.3~dfsg-1):
BLOCKED: Maybe temporary, maybe blocked but Britney is missing
information (check below)
Issues preventing migration:
missing build on mips64el
missing build on mipsel
Additional info:
Piuparts tested OK - https://piuparts.debian.org/sid/source/n/nodejs.html
Should wait for tests relating to nodejs 10.16.3~dfsg-1, but
forced by elbrus
autopkgtest for node-unicode-data: amd64: Test in progress
37 days old (needed 5 days)
Not considered
Now do we need for auto-icu migration to happen and complete which we
don't know will start when, as libicu65 is in experimental atm :(
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/icu
Looking forward to knowing more.
--
Regards,
Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल
My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com
E493 D466 6D67 59F5 1FD0 930F 870E 9A5B 5869 609C
More information about the Pkg-javascript-devel
mailing list