[Pkg-javascript-devel] nodejs-12 transition

[Xavier]

Le 17/01/2020 à 18:55, Nilesh Patra a écrit :
> 
> On Fri, 17 Jan 2020 at 05:02, Pirate Praveen <praveen at onenetbeyond.org
> <mailto:praveen at onenetbeyond.org>> wrote:
> 
>     On വെ, Jan 17, 2020 at 07:33, Paolo Greppi <paolo.greppi at libpf.com
>     <mailto:paolo.greppi at libpf.com>>
>     wrote:
>     > Il 16/01/20 20:35, Pirate Praveen ha scritto:
>     >>
>     >>
>     >>  On വ്യാ, Jan 16, 2020 at 13:27, Nilesh Patra
>     >> <npatra974 at gmail.com <mailto:npatra974 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>     >>>  Hi,
>     >>>  I had been lately seeing discussions in the list regarding
>     >>> requiring transition for nodejs-12 to unstable. I tested all the
>     >>> reverse depends and this is the list of all failing
>     >>> reverse-depends[1] and the repository[2] contains all the
>     >>> individual logs(for all reverse-depends) for convenience.
>     >>>  Also rebuilt the reverse-build-depends and this[3] is the list of
>     >>> depends that fail and the individual logs are in the same
>     >>> repository[4]
>     >>>
>     >>>  [1];
>     >>>
>     https://git.fosscommunity.in/gi-boi/nodejs_autopkgtest_results/blob/master/rdeps
>     >>>  [2]:
>     >>> https://git.fosscommunity.in/gi-boi/nodejs_autopkgtest_results/
>     >>>  [3]:
>     >>>
>     https://git.fosscommunity.in/gi-boi/nodejs_rebuild_results/blob/master/rebuild_deps
>     >>>  [4]: https://git.fosscommunity.in/gi-boi/nodejs_rebuild_results/
>     >>>
> 
> [..]
> 
>     >>  Thanks a lot Nilesh for doing it. This is really helpful.
>     >>  Some the failures may be unrelated to nodejs 12 change, for example
>     >>  https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/node-dagre-layout this is already
>     >> failing (I think thanks to /usr/lib to /usr/share migration).
>     >> Similarly for autopkgtest. So among the packages that failed, we
>     >> need to find out which of them are already failing (we can get this
>     >> information from tracker.debian.org <http://tracker.debian.org>).
>     >>
>     >>>  Thanks and Regards
>     >>>  Nilesh
>     >
>     > Hi Nilesh and thanks for the good work.
>     >
>     > For nodejs_autopkgtest_results, of the 1288 logs only 74 contain the
>     > string 'FAIL non-zero exit status' (see attached
>     > nodejs_autopkgtest_results-failed).
>     > I propose to mass-file bugs against each of them for easier tracking.
> 
>     I think a wiki page might be simpler at least for first pass.
>     See transition of rails 5 for example
>     https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/rails/-/wikis/Transition-to-Rails-5.2-for-Debian-Buster
> 
>     For packaes that can't be fixed easily we can file bugs.
> 
>     > For nodejs_rebuild_results, of the 1168 logs only the 62 in the
>     > rebdeps file actually failed.
>     > Some may be false positives as suggested by Praveen; had you used
>     > ratt [1] you could have told it to retry the failing builds without
>     > the new package (in this case nodejs 12), this would exclude most of
>     > those that are already failing.
>     > Who feels like doing it manually now for the 62 failing builds ?
> 
>     >
>     Once we have wiki, people can take ownership of a subset and look at
>     specific packages (dividing the whole work).
> 
> 
> I have created the wiki page here[1] with relevant reverse and reverse
> build depends. Updated the autopkgtest failures as per Paolo's list(74
> in number). The logs are available for individual logs for convenience
> as well.(marked the mail containing links above)
> 
> [1]:
> https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/nodejs/-/wikis/Transition-to-Nodejs-12-for-Debian-Unstable
> 
> Thanks and Regards
> Nilesh

Hi,

node-tap is ready, was just an output problem. (I forgot to bring my
Yubikey, then I'm unable to push it for now. NB: can be pushed directly
to unstable: just 3 tests disabled)

Cheers,
Xavier