[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#1002861: Bug#1002861: (no subject)

[Jonas Smedegaard]

[ resent Cc bugreport ]

Quoting Ayoyimika Ajibade (2022-02-08 04:09:10)
> Yes, the first option was what I meant and I shared the patch which is 
> the upstream commit here
> https://github.com/digitalbazaar/forge/issues/944
> my own implementation which is a WIP is here
> https://salsa.debian.org/Ayoyimika/node-node-forge/-/commit/8f43c5b97be7437ec170ed220845ead6d123015b.patch

Sorry, I am still confused.

When you say that you meant the first option, I guess you mean this:

> On Mon, Feb 7, 2022 at 8:28 PM Jonas Smedegaard <jonas at jones.dk> 
> wrote:
> >  a) your test was for the existing Debian package in unstable, 
> >     changed to include a patch cherry-picked from upstream git repo.

What confuses me is that when I look at upstream issue #944 I see a 
conversation, not a patch against current version in Debian upstable.

Please note that I do *not* insist that you must provide a patch, I only 
try to understand you, and understand what is the status here.

It seems to me that no patch exist for current version in Debian 
unstable to work with webpack5, but instead a patch exist (by you) 
against newer upstream release 1.2.1, and some upstream *draft* work 
exist as well.

Am I missing something?


Kind regards, and thanks for your patience with me,

 - Jonas

-- 
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: signature
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-javascript-devel/attachments/20220208/5409b08a/attachment.sig>