[Pkg-julia-devel] building julia 0.3
Ross Boylan
rossboylan at stanfordalumni.org
Wed Jul 23 04:31:37 UTC 2014
I redid the make (with the SUITESPARSE removed), but I'm not entirely
sure what happened. First, I don't see a reference to a sparse
submodule, though something was downloaded. Second, some libraries
were built, but not the julia executable. Will it just pick the right
ones up dynamically?
/usr/local/src/julia/julia /usr/local/src/julia
Submodule 'deps/Rmath' () registered for path 'deps/Rmath'
Submodule 'deps/libuv' () registered for path 'deps/libuv'
Submodule 'deps/openlibm' () registered for path 'deps/openlibm'
Submodule 'deps/openspecfun' () registered for path 'deps/openspecfun'
Submodule 'doc/juliadoc' () registered for path 'doc/juliadoc'
% Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current
Dload Upload Total Spent Left Speed
100 21.4M 100 21.4M 0 0 261k 0 0:01:24 0:01:24 --:--:-- 227k
ar: creating libcerbla.a
a - xerbla.o
ar: creating libsuitesparseconfig.a
a - SuiteSparse_config.o
ar: creating libamd.a
a - amd_global.o
[much more]
ar: creating librbio.a
a - RBio.o
cholmod_version does appear on the transcript, and there are no errors
that I see.
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Viral Shah <viral at mayin.org> wrote:
> I do not know what the versions of the dependencies in debian stable are.
>
> cholmod_version was introduced in the last few months, and hence a newer version may be required. Try removing the USE_SYSTEM_SUITESPARSE=1 build option. I am pretty sure also that the lapack version will be too old - at least 3.4 would be good.
lapack is 3.4 in Wheezy, so I continued to use the system version.
>
> -viral
>
More information about the Pkg-julia-devel
mailing list