[Pkg-julia-devel] building julia 0.3

[Ross Boylan]

After the rebuild I launched julia (from emacs/ess).  lsof doesn't
list libcholmod from either the system or the julia tree.  Maybe I
need to do something that requires it to get it loaded.

Ross

On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 9:31 PM, Ross Boylan
<rossboylan at stanfordalumni.org> wrote:
> I redid the make (with the SUITESPARSE removed), but I'm not entirely
> sure what happened.  First, I don't see a reference to a sparse
> submodule, though something was downloaded.  Second, some libraries
> were built, but not the julia executable.  Will it just pick the right
> ones up dynamically?
>
> /usr/local/src/julia/julia /usr/local/src/julia
> Submodule 'deps/Rmath' () registered for path 'deps/Rmath'
> Submodule 'deps/libuv' () registered for path 'deps/libuv'
> Submodule 'deps/openlibm' () registered for path 'deps/openlibm'
> Submodule 'deps/openspecfun' () registered for path 'deps/openspecfun'
> Submodule 'doc/juliadoc' () registered for path 'doc/juliadoc'
>   % Total    % Received % Xferd  Average Speed   Time    Time     Time  Current
>                                  Dload  Upload   Total   Spent    Left  Speed
> 100 21.4M  100 21.4M    0     0   261k      0  0:01:24  0:01:24 --:--:--  227k
> ar: creating libcerbla.a
> a - xerbla.o
> ar: creating libsuitesparseconfig.a
> a - SuiteSparse_config.o
> ar: creating libamd.a
> a - amd_global.o
> [much more]
> ar: creating librbio.a
> a - RBio.o
>
> cholmod_version does appear on the transcript, and there are no errors
> that I see.
>
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Viral Shah <viral at mayin.org> wrote:
>> I do not know what the versions of the dependencies in debian stable are.
>>
>> cholmod_version was introduced in the last few months, and hence a newer version may be required. Try removing the USE_SYSTEM_SUITESPARSE=1 build option. I am pretty sure also that the lapack version will be too old - at least 3.4 would be good.
>
> lapack is 3.4 in Wheezy, so I continued to use the system version.
>
>>
>> -viral
>>