[Pkg-julia-devel] Naming openlibm upstream tarball

Graham Inggs ginggs at debian.org
Tue Jun 21 14:42:19 UTC 2016


On 21/06/2016 13:45, Graham Inggs wrote:
> Hi Peter
>
> I noticed that we still repack the openlibm upstream tarball and 
> remove the non-free file i387/osx_asm.h, by means of the 
> Files-Excluded field in debian/copyright.
>
> You named the upstream tarball openlibm_0.5.1.orig.tar.gz, but my 
> understanding is it should be named openlibm_0.5.1+dfsg.orig.tar.gz 
> because of the file removal.
>
> Regards
> Graham
>

The i386 build failed during the tests:

gcc -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -g -O2 -fstack-protector-strong 
-Wformat -Werror=format-security  -Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions -Wl,-z,relro 
-Wl,-z,now test-double.c -D__BSD_VISIBLE -I ../include -I../src -L.. 
-lopenlibm -Wl,-rpath=/«PKGBUILDDIR» -o test-double
gcc -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -g -O2 -fstack-protector-strong 
-Wformat -Werror=format-security  -Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions -Wl,-z,relro 
-Wl,-z,now test-float.c -D__BSD_VISIBLE -I ../include -I../src -L.. 
-lopenlibm -Wl,-rpath=/«PKGBUILDDIR» -o test-float
../libopenlibm.so: undefined reference to `__fpgetprec'

The arm64 build was successful after debian/libopenlibm2.symbols was 
updated.
I committed this to git, but I don't mind doing it again if you want to 
re-write history.




More information about the Pkg-julia-devel mailing list