[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#364741: digikamimageplugins_0.8.1-2(m68k/unstable): tries to use nonexistent libXcursor.la

[Achim Bohnet]

On Tuesday 25 April 2006 17:43, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 04:26:04PM +0200, Achim Bohnet wrote:
> > On Tuesday 25 April 2006 16:18, Achim Bohnet wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 25 April 2006 13:23, wouter at debian.org wrote:
> > [...]
> > > digikamimageplugins is not using libXcursor.la directly.  It indirectly
> > > inherits it for some .la of another pkg in the build dependency
> > > tree (pkg not rebuild with the X11R7 yet I assume).
> > > 
> > > I see that libkipi, libkexif and digikam also failed to build on m68k
> > > (these pkgs are build deps of digikamimageplugins)
> > > so it could well be that the older debs still refer to libXcursor.la
> > > and libXrender.la 
> >  
> > Hi Wouter,
> > Sorry I forgot to ask:
> > 
> > Can you trigger a rebuild of the build failure in this
> > order on m68k:
> > 
> > 	libkexif
> > 	libkipi
> > 	digikam
> > 	digikamimageplugins
> > 
> > or have I to ask on debian-release to trigger it?
> 
> No, we need to do that.

okay.
> 
> But there's a bigger problem with QT4 not building on m68k currently due
> to a compiler bug. That'll need fixing before any of that will make
> sense.

FWIW, all KDE apps do depend on qt3 not qt4.  So all KDE apps do not care
about qt4 but the missing kdelibs4-dev as already reported by Fathi.

Achim
-- 
  To me vi is Zen.  To use vi is to practice zen. Every command is
  a koan. Profound to the user, unintelligible to the uninitiated.
  You discover truth everytime you use it.
                                      -- reddy at lion.austin.ibm.com