[Pkg-kde-extras] digikam_7.0.0-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental
Steven Robbins
steve at sumost.ca
Thu Aug 20 01:24:37 BST 2020
On Wednesday, August 19, 2020 9:03:03 A.M. CDT Pino Toscano wrote:
> In data mercoledì 19 agosto 2020 15:38:46 CEST, Steven Robbins ha scritto:
> > On Wednesday, August 19, 2020 5:48:50 A.M. CDT Pino Toscano wrote:
> > > Hi Steve,
> > >
> > > Can you please not upload binaries, and do source-only uploads?
> >
> > I was under the impression that a new source tarball required a binary
> > upload. I'll certainly do a source-only when transition to unstable.
>
> Luckly not! It would be maddness otherwise.
>
> The only two situations that require binary uploads are when going
> through the NEW queue, which means either
> a) src:foo does not exist, like for a new package
I think this is where I was getting muddled -- I was thinking that changing
the source tarball means a new source. But you've set me straight, thank you.
Won't happen again.
> > Right now I'm stuck because qtwebengine5-dev, a newly-added build-dep is
> > not built on all architectures. So I have to figure out a way around
> > that.
> Does digikam require QtWebEngine exclusively?
I need to check. Last version did NOT use it, but this time there was a
compile issue which I solved by adding this dependency not realising the
implications. I will go back and see if it is really optional. Or maybe, as
you say, use QtWebKit.
Thanks!
-Steve
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-kde-extras/attachments/20200819/cde1f05d/attachment.sig>
More information about the pkg-kde-extras
mailing list