[Pkg-kde-extras] digikam_7.0.0-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental

Steven Robbins steve at sumost.ca
Thu Aug 20 01:24:37 BST 2020


On Wednesday, August 19, 2020 9:03:03 A.M. CDT Pino Toscano wrote:
> In data mercoledì 19 agosto 2020 15:38:46 CEST, Steven Robbins ha scritto:
> > On Wednesday, August 19, 2020 5:48:50 A.M. CDT Pino Toscano wrote:
> > > Hi Steve,
> > > 
> > > Can you please not upload binaries, and do source-only uploads?
> > 
> > I was under the impression that a new source tarball required a binary
> > upload. I'll certainly do a source-only when transition to unstable.
> 
> Luckly not! It would be maddness otherwise.
> 
> The only two situations that require binary uploads are when going
> through the NEW queue, which means either
> a) src:foo does not exist, like for a new package

I think this is where I was getting muddled -- I was thinking that changing 
the source tarball means a new source.  But you've set me straight, thank you.  
Won't happen again.


> > Right now I'm stuck because qtwebengine5-dev, a newly-added build-dep is
> > not built on all architectures.  So I have to figure out a way around
> > that.
> Does digikam require QtWebEngine exclusively?

I need to check.  Last version did NOT use it, but this time there was a 
compile issue which I solved by adding this dependency not realising the 
implications.  I will go back and see if it is really optional.  Or maybe, as 
you say, use QtWebKit.

Thanks!
-Steve
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-kde-extras/attachments/20200819/cde1f05d/attachment.sig>


More information about the pkg-kde-extras mailing list