[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#952426: digikam: digkam experimental not correctly instalable

[Agustin Martin]

On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 12:09:58PM +0100, Simon Frei wrote:
> On 24/02/2020 11:38, Eric Valette wrote:
> > On 24/02/2020 10:50, Simon Frei wrote:
> >
> >> one is 103. That suggests you aren't running the digikam binary from the
> >> package, but something else (maybe you self-compiled at some point?).
> >> Check the output of which digikam.
> >
> >
> > Did you just test your packages before uploading?
> >
> >  ldd /usr/bin/digikam  | grep libhd
> >         libhdf5_serial.so.103 =>
> > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libhdf5_serial.so.103 (0x00007fd2c60f2000)
> >         libhdf5_serial_hl.so.100 => not found
> >
> Firstly: I don't upload digikam to debian. I am just a user interested
> in having it packaged and very occasional contributor upstream. By
> helping to triage and clarify bugs I hope to remove some workload from
> Steve (uploader), which hopefully makes it more likely to keep getting
> packages from him (thanks a lot for that!).
> 
> And my bad, apparently libhdf5-103 still ships the .100 lib:
> 
>     libhdf5-103: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libhdf5_serial_hl.so.100
> 
> At least it does in testing. I now upgraded libhdf5-103 to experimental
> and I do get the same error you do. Maybe at the time the experimental
> build was done the old version of hdf5 was still in experimental. Anyway
> the fix for you is to downgrade libhdf5-103 to unstable and for the
> package probably as simple as a rebuild (which in my opinion isn't
> really necessary unless there's another change, e.g. beta3).

Hi,

According to https://packages.debian.org/source/experimental/hdf5 there is a
new "libhdf5-hl-100" package in experimental. Looking into it, seems that
libhdf5_serial_hl.so.100 has been moved there, so installing that new package
should help in experimental. I still wonder what is pulling it during build.

Regards,

-- 
Agustin