[Pkg-kde-extras] Debian NEW: automated review of mpvqt 1.2.1-1

[dfsg-team at debian.org]

Hi,

Your upload of mpvqt 1.2.1-1 to the NEW queue has had an automated review: an LLM-based check of its licensing and packaging, run by the DFSG team using the Debian Inference service. It is not a decision on the package, and - like other LLM-based work - it can be wrong.

It found 0 blocker, 2 important, 1 minor issues:

  - [important] [licensing] Files: * names the LGPL triple licence for the CC0-1.0 files .gitignore, .gitlab-ci.yml and .kde-ci.yml
  - [important] [licensing] Files: debian/* gives GPL-3.0-or-later for debian/rules, which is LGPL-2.0-or-later, and does not name its holder Jonathan Riddell
  - [minor] [licensing] The LGPL-2.1-only and LGPL-3.0-only License paragraphs quote the wrong notices and mislabel the common-licenses pointer

You can read the full review here:

    https://dfsg-new-queue.debian.org/reviews/mpvqt#assistant-report

Please look at it, and respond by visiting the link below (you'll be asked to authenticate with Salsa first):

    https://dfsg-new-queue.debian.org/llm-review/suceoGNGcHe77YVfZN8u1v8Ahorhg_BO

There you may choose to reject the upload yourself, while you fix issues and re-upload, or add comments to clarify or dispute the review.

Your comments are for the DFSG team member who reviews the package, not for the LLM: it will not read them or reply. Tell the reviewer where you think the automated review is right or wrong, and why. Comments are public and shown with the review; you may use markdown, e.g. to link to clarifying information.

If you have any questions, please reply to this e-mail and someone from the
team will respond.

If you would rather not be e-mailed about these reviews, log in at https://dfsg-new-queue.debian.org
and say so on your profile page.

Thanks!