Bug#896464: Passing -V as default

Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer perezmeyer at gmail.com
Tue Apr 24 20:46:51 BST 2018


El mar., 24 de abr. de 2018 02:47, Niels Thykier <niels at thykier.net>
escribió:

> Scott Kitterman:
> >
> >
> > On April 23, 2018 10:03:45 PM UTC, "Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer"
> <perezmeyer at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> If I understand correctly and, let's suppose, libQtFoo 5.10.2 is built
> >> with a patched compat 12, then all applications rebuilt against 5.10.2
> >> would require at very least 5.10.2 even if symbols files allowed it to
> >> depend on a minor version.
> >>
>
> As far as I understand it, symbols files overrule shlibs.  I.e. if your
> symbols files covers all the symbols required by the application, the
> version will be derived from the symbols file.
>
> dpkg-shlibdeps(1) seems to agree with this:

[snip]

Interesting. That sounds pretty good then. I'll check the next time I
rebuild qt.

> If that's true, I doubt C++ symbols files  are worth the trouble.
> >
> > Scott K
> >
>
> I think this case would still work as it used too (e.g. ok for .debs and
> ignored for .udebs - but as I recall, qtbase-abi does not have any udebs
> and should not be concerned by that)
>

If everything works as we understand it now then yes, it should just simply
work.

>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-kde-talk/attachments/20180424/07d0c304/attachment.html>


More information about the pkg-kde-talk mailing list