dh & dhmk

[Sandro Knauß]

Hey,

In meanwhile pino also uploaded some packages that use dh. I'm completly 
puzzled. Have we made a conclusion to switch to dh?

> On Fri, May 01, 2020 at 09:50:53PM +0200, Sandro Knauß wrote:
> > > * $(overridden_command), which takes care of invoking the command of
> > > the override with all the needed parameters; while this seems trivial
> > > to replace, imagine all the times -S/--buildsystem=kde/kf5 was
> > > forgotten when overriding dh_auto_configure... which makes all the
> > > Frameworks 5.41.0 in experimental :-) (thanks for proving my point)
> 
> The latest debhelper supports execute_before_X and execute_after_X targets,
> which should make $(overridden_command) less useful. It will be only useful
> when you want to pass some additional options to the overridden command.

yeah it helps a lot. Also dh-sequence-{addon} is quite nice moves stuff from 
rules file to control.
But sill one very common override is dh_auto_configure. 
@pino can you tell me what is the correct way to execute dh_auto_configure with 
dh? 
and how do I know, wen I have to add -S XX and when not? 
because for dh_auto_test is it not needed right?
where I can find those things?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-kde-talk/attachments/20200504/c2a7abdd/attachment.sig>