Bug#686231: still not fixed

[Vincent Lefevre]

On 2012-12-11 07:38:47 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> On 11/12/2012 00:23, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > On 2012-12-10 20:44:08 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> >> Gcc plugin system sucks from a distribution point of view...
> >> The best solution would be to rebuild dragonegg at installation time.
> > 
> > How about adding dependencies?
> > 
> > For instance, dragonegg-4.6 could depend on some fixed version
> > of gcc-4.6. Or if you think that a dependency shouldn't be added
> > there, it could be done for llvm-gcc-4.6; it currently has:
> > 
> > Depends: dragonegg-4.6, gcc-4.6, g++-4.6
> > 
> > Using = dependencies would solve the problem.
> No, it would not.
> dragonegg even fails when built with gcc 4.7.2-12 (experimental) and
> used with gcc 4.7.2-4 (unstable).

That's precisely why I suggest = dependencies: gcc 4.7.2-4 and
a dragonegg-4.6 built with 4.7.2-12 couldn't be installed at the
same time.

-- 
Vincent Lefèvre <vincent at vinc17.net> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.net/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.net/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)