Bug#686231: still not fixed

[Sylvestre Ledru]

On 11/12/2012 09:21, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2012-12-11 07:38:47 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
>> On 11/12/2012 00:23, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
>>> On 2012-12-10 20:44:08 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
>>>> Gcc plugin system sucks from a distribution point of view...
>>>> The best solution would be to rebuild dragonegg at installation time.
>>>
>>> How about adding dependencies?
>>>
>>> For instance, dragonegg-4.6 could depend on some fixed version
>>> of gcc-4.6. Or if you think that a dependency shouldn't be added
>>> there, it could be done for llvm-gcc-4.6; it currently has:
>>>
>>> Depends: dragonegg-4.6, gcc-4.6, g++-4.6
>>>
>>> Using = dependencies would solve the problem.
>> No, it would not.
>> dragonegg even fails when built with gcc 4.7.2-12 (experimental) and
>> used with gcc 4.7.2-4 (unstable).
> 
> That's precisely why I suggest = dependencies: gcc 4.7.2-4 and
> a dragonegg-4.6 built with 4.7.2-12 couldn't be installed at the
> same time.
> 
Could you provide a patch ? I am not sure to see what you mean.

Thanks,
Sylvestre