[pkg-lxc-devel] Bug#1002564: Bug#1002564: lxc: packaging adjustments for LXD

[Pierre-Elliott Bécue]

Hi Mathias,

Mathias Gibbens <mathias at calenhad.com> wrote on 29/01/2022 at 03:41:40+0100:
> On Fri, 2022-01-28 at 01:33 +0100, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote:
>> I've made some changes I've decided to upload on salsa and on
>> experimental.
>> 
>> If you're able to test these changes on some clean environment, I'd
>> be
>> happy if you could do it as I like the time to redo a clean testing
>> environment for lxc right now.
>> 
>> If you can't, I'll try to do it this weekend or during the next week.
>
>   Thanks! I took a quick look this evening and noticed one thing -- the
> directory `usr/lib/*/lxc/rootfs` is still listed in the d/lxc.install
> file. Can that also get moved over into the liblxc-common package? LXD
> expects to be able to use that directory similarly to lxc when starting
> up containers.

Ah, sorry. It slipped out from my sight.

>   As it looks like liblxc-common is including the
> /usr/sbin/init.lxc{,.static} binaries it can't be an Architecture: all
> package, so having a directory with an architecture-dependent path
> hopefully won't be an issue. (Side note, in d/control, would it make
> sense to keep liblxc-common as Architecture: linux-any to match all the
> other binary packages that are built?)

Indeed! You're right. I've changed to linux-any.

>   I'll do a build and test of LXD in a fresh environment this weekend
> and report back on any other issues I find.

Thanks for your feedback and for spotting these issues. :)

-- 
PEB
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 853 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-lxc-devel/attachments/20220129/c14cced2/attachment.sig>