[pkg-lxqt-devel] Bug#930334: lxqt (2nd try, sorry for the 1st, mail was incomplete)

[Andrew Lee]

Hi Amy,

Thank you for keep eyes on lxqt. I saw you have many activity on BTS and
salsa.
I cc'ed this email to LXQt packaging team. Hope everyone in the team can
also sync with these updates.

I have some questions:
It seems to me that the MRs you submitted were a workaround for
lxqt-archiver
replacement as lxqt-archiver is currently missing?

Since lxqt-archiver has already uploaded into NEW. Will it breaks if users
installed
lxqt-archiver afterwards? If not, how can users make lxqt-archiver works as
they
expected?

Should we wait a bit for lxqt-archiver to arrived since it designed by
upstream
and suppose to work and supported by upstream?

Best regards,

-Andrew


Amy Kos <amy at disroot.org> 於 2021年1月13日 週三 上午1:18寫道：

> Hi Andrew,
>
> thank you very much for uploading up to date lxqt packages.
>
> I've closed:
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=960040
> New lxqt-metapackages are probably optional,
> also lxqt-archiver is not yet through ftp new byhand queue.
>
> I've tried to make a draft for lxqt-metapackages in salsa,
> not sure if it is helpful at all, if not please close it.
>
> If possible, some time, please look at:
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/lxqt-team/libfm-qt/-/merge_requests/2
> Update archivers.list fix xarchiver command - a30ef507
>
> and
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/lxde-team/libfm/-/merge_requests/2
> Update archivers.list fix xarchiver command - 103c4695
>
> to finally fix:
>
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=930334
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=932461
>
> Cheers,
> Amy
>


-- 
-Andrew
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-lxqt-devel/attachments/20210113/6d9d1c5e/attachment-0001.html>