daniel at pocock.pro
Sun Apr 30 11:17:18 UTC 2017
On 30/04/17 10:14, Russell Coker wrote:
> Dario Minnucci and I are making "mon" a team maintained package. Would it be
> appropriate to use this list as the "maintainer" address for the package? I
> expect that everyone who maintains monitoring software also has some interest
> in other packages (I'm happy to skim the traffic of other monitoring packages
> and help out when there's issues related to my areas of skill) and it seems
> that there's already more than a few packages discussed on this list.
I don't think any policies have been made about which packages can or
can't be associated with this group so I think it would be perfectly OK
for you to do this for mon
Any feedback you have on the other packages would be very welcome too.
I recently tried to update loganalyzer and test it with the
rsyslog-pgsql package, they work together quite well using
dbconfig-common, if anybody else could give feedback about either of
these it would be great. I also found loganalyzer useful for detecting
any new problems in logs after upgrading systems to stretch.
More information about the Pkg-monitoring-maintainers