[Pkg-mozext-maintainers] Comments regarding status-4-evar_0.2011.07.20.21-1_amd64.changes

Ximin Luo infinity0 at gmx.com
Sun Sep 11 10:26:33 UTC 2011

On 11/09/11 10:54, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> software is licensed under one of MPL 1.1/GPL 2.0/LGPL 2.1,
> please mention that in copyright file.

ah, the addons.mozilla.org page for it shows the license as MPL-1.1 only, but i
see now that several of the js/css/xul files have tri-license headers. i'll go
email the author for clarification.

> Also, you should consider adding license headers for GPL and LGPL,
> and full MPL license in copyright file, instead of providing
> MPL-1.1.gz file in the binary package.

i don't believe it's a good idea to do custom formatting on huge unformatted
plain text files. i had been in a discussion with debian policy to address this
but it's not going anywhere.

atm we're just doing the same thing as the iceweasel package, which is allowed
for by policy but technically against the DEP5 format.



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 900 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-mozext-maintainers/attachments/20110911/ae924f6c/attachment-0001.pgp>

More information about the Pkg-mozext-maintainers mailing list