[Pkg-mozext-maintainers] Bug#937085: Bug#937085: mozilla-devscripts: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

[Håvard F. Aasen]

On Wed, 3 Aug 2022 22:59:28 +0200 Paul Gevers <elbrus at debian.org> wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 01-08-2022 21:36, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > On Wed, 27 Jul 2022 10:37:25 +0200 =?UTF-8?Q?H=c3=a5vard_F=2e_Aasen?= 
> > <havard.f.aasen at pfft.no> wrote:
> >> I have continued working on the redland-bindings package, cleaned it up a
> >> bit, and enabled the Python 3 testsuite. I created an MR [1]. I 
> >> believe redland-bindings is ready to be uploaded to NEW/unstable.
> > 
> > I just uploaded it to NEW/experimental. Which means that once accepted 
> > we can iron out mozilla-devscripts there too.
> 
> It seems I screwed up and uploaded to unstable. Benjamin, Håvard, do you 
> prefer it that I fix this and upload my changes to experimental and 
> reinstate the version in unstable, or are you happy to take it from here?
> 
> > paul at mulciber ~ $ reverse-depends -b mozilla-devscripts

Thanks for this, wasn't aware of this script.

> > Reverse-Testsuite-Triggers
> > * devscripts
> > 
> > Reverse-Build-Depends
> > * autofill-forms
> Not in testing
> 
> > * devscripts
> Only a <!nocheck> BD, the binary only has a Recommends.
> 
> > * dispmua
> > * mozilla-noscript
> Not in testing
> 
> > * tinyjsd
> Not in testing
> 
> > * tree-style-tab
> > * umatrix
> Not in testing
> 
> Are those two packages in testing really still worth all this? (Just 
> asking, no opinion).
> 
Starting to wonder about the same thing. Is this package nearing obsolete?

I've created an MR [1], I believe that should close this bug, It's only
the Python 3 part, but it doesn't seem to require much more. It would
be nice if the maintainer would take a look.

Håvard

[1] https://salsa.debian.org/webext-team/webext-devscripts/-/merge_requests/3