ffmpeg status?
Fabian Greffrath
greffrath at leat.rub.de
Mon Jun 16 07:37:52 UTC 2008
Reinhard Tartler schrieb:
> Well, it is of course not 'our' fault. Adding the necessary
> conflicts/replaces on libavcodeccvs and co is however pretty easy for us
> and we do a big favor to our users using http://debian-multimedia.org if
> we are doing that (and we'll get less bugreports about that).
Allright.
> I don't think we are doing our users a service by providing a crippled
> ffmpeg package in main called 'ffmpeg'. I think having the source
> package reflecting the fact that it is not as upstream released it is
> only honest.
Allright. Moreover I (AFAICT upstream, too) am happy with any other
package name than 'ffmpeg-free'. ;)
I had another idea over the weekend: Given that there are quite some
dependencies between the libraries -dev packages in ffmpeg, how do you
like the idea of a single 'ffmpeg-dev' package that contains all
headers and static libraries?
How can we process in getting rid of ffmpeg-config?
More information about the pkg-multimedia-maintainers
mailing list