Team FAQ - proposed new member policy
freee at debian.org
Sun Apr 19 10:53:53 UTC 2009
Great job Reinhard, thanks!
|--==> On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 07:22:58 +0200, Reinhard Tartler <siretart at tauware.de> said:
>>Also, the WNPP info is somewhat in contradiction with the FAQ: on the
>>one hand, we have packages in which we "are" interested and in the
>>other hand we won't become sponsors like the debian-mentors list.
RT> I assume you mean with WNPP the wiki page
RT> Well, that page is not totally obsolete. E.g. it documents (or at least
RT> should) document that and how we are using git, what should be in the
RT> maintainer field and such. But I agree that trimming out anything not
RT> related to "packaging policy" makes sense to me.
Yeah, I guess that list is severely obsolete. I'm cc-ing Tim Hall, who
used to take care of it. We should probably:
1) create a separate page for WNPP packages and move the table currently
in DevelopPackaging to it
2) updated the table
More information about the pkg-multimedia-maintainers