Team FAQ - proposed new member policy

Free Ekanayaka freee at
Sun Apr 19 10:53:53 UTC 2009

Great job Reinhard, thanks!

|--==> On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 07:22:58 +0200, Reinhard Tartler <siretart at> said:

  >>Also, the WNPP info is somewhat in contradiction with the FAQ: on the
  >>one hand, we have packages in which we "are" interested and in the
  >>other hand we won't become sponsors like the debian-mentors list.

  RT> I assume you mean with WNPP the wiki page
  RT> DebianMultimedia/DevelopPackaging.

  RT> Well, that page is not totally obsolete. E.g. it documents (or at least
  RT> should) document that and how we are using git, what should be in the
  RT> maintainer field and such. But I agree that trimming out anything not
  RT> related to "packaging policy" makes sense to me.

Yeah, I guess that list is severely obsolete. I'm cc-ing Tim Hall, who
used to take care of it. We should probably:

1) create a separate page for WNPP packages and move the table currently
   in DevelopPackaging to it

2) updated the table



More information about the pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list