Debimedia archive

[Felipe Sateler]

El domingo 16 de agosto, Andres Mejia escribió:
> On Thursday 13 August 2009 04:13:18 Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> > Felipe Sateler <fsateler at gmail.com> writes:
> > ATM I see debimedia as 'the missing bits' of debian that are not allowed
> > in because of mainly political reasons regarding unheld discussions with
> > ftp-master and the DPL.  Yes, I do seek more discussion about the
> > problem, but currently, nobody seems really interested in talking to us
> > (or me?) about this topic, so I decided to actually do something about
> > it.
>
> It's probably a good idea to get a consensus on what debimedia will and
> will not be. Have you looked at the wiki page [1]?

http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia/debimedia, you forgot to add the link. 
Thanks for pointing the page up! I makes it a lot clearer.

> > >> > How will we manage bugs to those packages, since they won't have the
> > >> > BTS infrastructure?
> > >>
> > >> As interim solution, I'd suggest to use either alioth tickets or
> > >> launchpad.net until we find a better solution.
> > >
> > > OK. Perhaps it will be possible to convince the bts admins to allow us
> > > to use it.
> >
> > That would be ideal, indeed.
>
> I would like this too, but in case this doesn't happen, I'll be happy to
> have a place where I can report bugs.

Setting up another instance of debbugs should be possible, too. Although I 
don't know how easy it is, given that the package is horribly outdated (last 
version if from 2003).

Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/attachments/20090816/b6dc8d44/attachment.pgp>