mcitadel at gmail.com
Mon Aug 17 01:07:31 UTC 2009
On Sunday 16 August 2009 17:53:28 Felipe Sateler wrote:
> El domingo 16 de agosto, Andres Mejia escribió:
> > On Thursday 13 August 2009 04:13:18 Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> > > Felipe Sateler <fsateler at gmail.com> writes:
> > > ATM I see debimedia as 'the missing bits' of debian that are not
> > > allowed in because of mainly political reasons regarding unheld
> > > discussions with ftp-master and the DPL. Yes, I do seek more
> > > discussion about the problem, but currently, nobody seems really
> > > interested in talking to us (or me?) about this topic, so I decided to
> > > actually do something about it.
> > It's probably a good idea to get a consensus on what debimedia will and
> > will not be. Have you looked at the wiki page ?
> http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia/debimedia, you forgot to add the
> link. Thanks for pointing the page up! I makes it a lot clearer.
> > > >> > How will we manage bugs to those packages, since they won't have
> > > >> > the BTS infrastructure?
> > > >>
> > > >> As interim solution, I'd suggest to use either alioth tickets or
> > > >> launchpad.net until we find a better solution.
> > > >
> > > > OK. Perhaps it will be possible to convince the bts admins to allow
> > > > us to use it.
> > >
> > > That would be ideal, indeed.
> > I would like this too, but in case this doesn't happen, I'll be happy to
> > have a place where I can report bugs.
> Setting up another instance of debbugs should be possible, too. Although I
> don't know how easy it is, given that the package is horribly outdated
> (last version if from 2003).
Check experimental. Another version was uploaded just today.
> Felipe Sateler
More information about the pkg-multimedia-maintainers