No subject

Thu Aug 20 06:46:28 UTC 2009

rasqal ABI (0.9.16) in rather than the new (0.9.17) in  (Assuming these are redland librdf 1.0.10 and rasqal librdf

redland 1.0.10 ( was packaged to link with the new rasqal 0.9.17
( and so the above stack trace should not be possible, unless
I've got the shared lib/package dependencies wrong.  Maybe librasqal2 should
conflict with librasqal1.


More information about the pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list