No subject
Thu Aug 20 06:46:28 UTC 2009
rasqal ABI (0.9.16) in librasqal.so.1 rather than the new (0.9.17) in
librasqal.so.2. (Assuming these are redland librdf 1.0.10 and rasqal librdf
0.9.17)
redland 1.0.10 (librdf.so.0) was packaged to link with the new rasqal 0.9.17
(librasqal.so.2) and so the above stack trace should not be possible, unless
I've got the shared lib/package dependencies wrong. Maybe librasqal2 should
conflict with librasqal1.
Dave
More information about the pkg-multimedia-maintainers
mailing list