[SCM] FFmpeg packaging branch, master, updated. upstream/0.svn20090119-38-g4098a63
Fabian Greffrath
greffrath at leat.rub.de
Tue Jan 27 08:53:08 UTC 2009
Dear Reinhard,
Reinhard Tartler schrieb:
> In fact, we could probably just create an replacement libavcodec, and
> take the other libraries from the 'ffmpeg-debian' package. When
> discussing the whole approach, we agreed (at least I think that we did)
> to generate the 'other' ffmpeg libraries as well, so that in case we
> update the 'ffmpeg-debian' package, users who have selfcompiled the
> stripped variants still have a version of the other libav* package that
> match to their version of avcodec.
sorry, I cannot remember the discussion and haven't followed it
closely. But, well, now that I think about it, isn't it silly to
recompile the whole bunch of libraries although only libavcodec is
actually modified? I mean, we do not build the ffmpeg* nor the
lib*-dev packages twice, simply because this is not needed. So why
should we rebuild all the other libraries and not only libavcodec?
Of course libavutil needs to be built first in order to build
libavcodec, but libavutil does not need to be packages as
libavutil-unstripped-* then. I believe we could achieve this via a
variable &(MAKE_TARGET) that is passed to the make calls and is set to
"libavcodec" if the unstripped ffmpeg package is built and to "all" else.
Again, sorry for the late objection, but this just came to my mind
yesterday evening.
Cheers,
Fabian
--
Dipl.-Phys. Fabian Greffrath
Ruhr-Universität Bochum
Lehrstuhl für Energieanlagen und Energieprozesstechnik (LEAT)
Universitätsstr. 150, IB 3/134
D-44780 Bochum
Telefon: +49 (0)234 / 32-26334
Fax: +49 (0)234 / 32-14227
E-Mail: greffrath at leat.ruhr-uni-bochum.de
More information about the pkg-multimedia-maintainers
mailing list