transition: liblo

Felipe Sateler fsateler at gmail.com
Wed Nov 4 01:52:51 UTC 2009


On Fri, 2009-10-16 at 17:40 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-09-27 at 16:29 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian.org at packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: transition
> > 
> > New upstream liblo bumps SONAME, so we need to transition. Also, we take
> > this opportunity to change the -dev package name to unversion it.
> > liblo-dev now provides liblo0-dev to avoid breaking too many packages.
> > However, rosegarden and sineshaper have versioned build-dependencies on
> > liblo0-dev. They both require versions already in oldstable, so a simple
> > NMU dropping the versioning is enough for them. All other packages
> > should require binNMUs, and the new version is supposed to be API-compatible
> > with the old one.
> 
> Ping?

Again? Someone in here?


-- 
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/attachments/20091103/1a390dfd/attachment.pgp>


More information about the pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list