Re: transition: liblo

[Jaromír Mikeš]

> Od: Felipe Sateler <fsateler at gmail.com>

FS > Package: release.debian.org
FS > Severity: normal
FS > User: release.debian.org at packages.debian.org
FS > Usertags: transition
 
FS > New upstream liblo bumps SONAME, so we need to transition. Also, we take
FS > this opportunity to change the -dev package name to unversion it.
FS > liblo-dev now provides liblo0-dev to avoid breaking too many packages.
FS > However, rosegarden and sineshaper have versioned build-dependencies on
FS > liblo0-dev. They both require versions already in oldstable, so a simple
FS > NMU dropping the versioning is enough for them. All other packages
FS > should require binNMUs, and the new version is supposed to be
FS > API-compatible with the old one.

Hi Felipe,

sorry for newbie like question I don't understand how this process should be done.
Can I help with it somehow?
btw lv2fil and zynjacku package I would like get uploaded will take advantage from new liblo version.

regards

mira