Free Ekanayaka freee at
Mon Sep 28 19:19:12 UTC 2009

Hi Mira,
|--==> On Mon, 28 Sep 2009 00:15:54 +0200 (CEST), Jaromír Mikeš <mira.mikes at> said:

  JM> Hi,
  JM> I adopted lash and uploaded to debian multimedia  packagers repo.


  JM> Made few improvements:
  JM> #
  JM> Changed tarball-in-tarball packaging approach to uncompressed-source-in-tarball
  JM> Man pages for lashd added
  JM> liblash2.symbols file added
  JM> lash-doc.doc-base file added
  JM> Deleted dirs file
  JM> Cleaned watch file
  JM> Removed lines for operating tarball in rules file
  JM> Changed maintainer
  JM> added "uploaders" field
  JM> added "Vcs-Git:" field
  JM> added "Vcs-Browser" field,
  JM> Changed compatibility from 5 to 7
  JM> #
  JM> this removing several lintian warnings.
  JM> Package is now lintian clean excepting some "spelling-errors" and errors relating to still unedited changelog file.

  JM> my question is: Should I edit changelog file or it should be done by uploading DD?

Please go ahead editing the changelog.

  JM> second question: Should I asking for upload if there is no newer
  JM> upstream version, or I should wait for it and ask for uploading
  JM> then?

Considering that these changes are mostly packaging-related, I think
it's fine to wait for a new upstream version, for some higher priority



More information about the pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list