freee at debian.org
Mon Sep 28 19:19:12 UTC 2009
|--==> On Mon, 28 Sep 2009 00:15:54 +0200 (CEST), Jaromír Mikeš <mira.mikes at seznam.cz> said:
JM> I adopted lash and uploaded to debian multimedia packagers repo.
JM> Made few improvements:
JM> Changed tarball-in-tarball packaging approach to uncompressed-source-in-tarball
JM> Man pages for lashd added
JM> liblash2.symbols file added
JM> lash-doc.doc-base file added
JM> Deleted dirs file
JM> Cleaned watch file
JM> Removed lines for operating tarball in rules file
JM> Changed maintainer
JM> added "uploaders" field
JM> added "Vcs-Git:" field
JM> added "Vcs-Browser" field,
JM> Changed compatibility from 5 to 7
JM> this removing several lintian warnings.
JM> Package is now lintian clean excepting some "spelling-errors" and errors relating to still unedited changelog file.
JM> my question is: Should I edit changelog file or it should be done by uploading DD?
Please go ahead editing the changelog.
JM> second question: Should I asking for upload if there is no newer
JM> upstream version, or I should wait for it and ask for uploading
Considering that these changes are mostly packaging-related, I think
it's fine to wait for a new upstream version, for some higher priority
More information about the pkg-multimedia-maintainers