On 09/14/2011 05:35 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote: > What's the difference? Should ecasound2.2 be RMed? > >From the Ubuntu side this would be great as with the 2.8 upload, ecasound2.2 retook the ecasound source package. This is causing the ecasound2.2 binaries to fail to upload since they're superseded. Thanks, Micah