src:ecasound / src:ecasound2.2

[Alessandro Ghedini]

On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 06:35:30PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> What's the difference? Should ecasound2.2 be RMed?

ecasound replaces ecasound2.2, so yes, ecasound2.2 should be removed (I
don't know how though).

Cheers

-- 
perl -E'$_=q;$/= @{[@_]};and s;\S+;<inidehG ordnasselA>;eg;say~~reverse'