libaacs_0.3.0-2_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

[Andres Mejia]

On Jan 13, 2012 6:40 AM, "Alessio Treglia" <alessio at debian.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 11:30 AM, Fabian Greffrath <fabian at greffrath.com>
wrote:
> > Should the packages get built twice, once without optimization for the
debug
> > package and once with optimization for the actual shared library
package? Or
> > is it necessary to disable all optimizations in the ragular shared
library
> > package in order for the debug package to work?
>
> Actually the default -g -02 would be the best, -03
> -fomit-frame-pointer (and other optimizations) should be stripped out,
> I think.

I prefer leaving upstreams optimizations intact. Anyone wanting to debug
these libraries can just build them from sources and install them to some
temp location (their home directory for example).

I personally don't bother with any dog packages.

And please leave the default optimizations for libbluray.

> --
> Alessio Treglia          | www.alessiotreglia.com
> Debian Developer         | alessio at debian.org
> Ubuntu Core Developer    | quadrispro at ubuntu.com
> 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A
>
> _______________________________________________
> pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
> pkg-multimedia-maintainers at lists.alioth.debian.org
>
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/attachments/20120113/64ae96a7/attachment-0001.html>