libaacs_0.3.0-2_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

[Andres Mejia]

On Jan 13, 2012 9:25 AM, "Andres Mejia" <mcitadel at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Jan 13, 2012 6:40 AM, "Alessio Treglia" <alessio at debian.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 11:30 AM, Fabian Greffrath <fabian at greffrath.com>
wrote:
> > > Should the packages get built twice, once without optimization for
the debug
> > > package and once with optimization for the actual shared library
package? Or
> > > is it necessary to disable all optimizations in the ragular shared
library
> > > package in order for the debug package to work?
> >
> > Actually the default -g -02 would be the best, -03
> > -fomit-frame-pointer (and other optimizations) should be stripped out,
> > I think.
>
> I prefer leaving upstreams optimizations intact. Anyone wanting to debug
these libraries can just build them from sources and install them to some
temp location (their home directory for example).
>
> I personally don't bother with any dog packages.

*dbg packages.

> And please leave the default optimizations for libbluray.
>
> > --
> > Alessio Treglia          | www.alessiotreglia.com
> > Debian Developer         | alessio at debian.org
> > Ubuntu Core Developer    | quadrispro at ubuntu.com
> > 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
> > pkg-multimedia-maintainers at lists.alioth.debian.org
> >
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/attachments/20120113/168c9c43/attachment.html>