[SCM] supercollider/master: Fix upstream tarball download

[Felipe Sateler]

On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 5:24 AM, Jonas Smedegaard <dr at jones.dk> wrote:
> On 12-06-25 at 09:17am, Dan S wrote:
>> One question: if a package "foo-6.4" was released un-stripped, and
>> then later was stripped for DFSG reasons, it would have to be
>> "foo-6.4+dfsg" rather than "foo-6.4~dfsg" wouldn't it? I guess that's
>> a different situation.
>
> Correct.
>
> It makes sense to use + sometimes.  My point is that it makes sense to
> favor ~ over + when both are possible.  And that it is worth the
> (slight) extra hassle of changing as long as the packaging has not yet
> been officially released.
>
> ...and as I understand it, Felipe disagrees with that last part.

No, I don't disagree. I just don't care much about this issue to fix
it. I do care about the get-orig-source rule not working, so I fixed
that.

>  And I
> got annoied by that, so much that I threw sarcasm - but I should've
> controlled my temper as a) it is perfectly ok to be lazy rather than
> strive for perfection, and b) it is not my job to dictate what others
> should do.
>
> Sorry, Felipe!

No worries. Apologies accepted.

-- 

Saludos,
Felipe Sateler