pd-iemlib: request for review/sponsoring

[IOhannes m zmölnig]

On 2013-12-12 18:41, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>>
>> so does this mean that they have to do another release that includes 
>> the .doc file in the source-package?
> 
> Yes: We need actual source, not just assurance that source exist.

darn. i thought so.

> 
> 
>> do we then have to actually *build* the pdf from the doc?
>> (or would a note suffice, that claims that the doc is the source of 
>> the pdf?)
> 
> If we want to ship the PDF with binary packages, then indeed it needs to 
> be built from the source (else we cannot be sure the binary that we ship 
> is not somehow different - e.g. contains non-free Adobe font code).

darn, i thought so too.

so what's the recommended (minimal) package to build PDFs from DOCs?



gfamdr
IOhannes

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 897 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/attachments/20131213/d4bf9723/attachment.sig>