Bug#694657: closed by Reinhard Tartler <siretart at tauware.de> (Bug#694657: fixed in libav 6:9.1-1)

[Jonas Smedegaard]

Quoting Francesco Poli (2013-01-09 22:08:58)
> On Wed, 9 Jan 2013 21:11:38 +0100 Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 7:18 PM, Francesco Poli
> [...]
> > > Which license is the libavcodec-extra-* package released under?
> > > LGPL-2.1+ or GPL-2+ ?
> > 
> > GPL-3+
> 
> GPL-3+ is the effective license of the binary package.
> My question was "which is the license for the source files which are
> compiled in order to generate that binary package?".

Maybe that is what you _now_ ask or what you _intended_ to ask earlier 
on, but what you have inside quotation marks here right above is not 
what you quote yourself as having said slightly further up.


[I'll comment on that other post separately]

 - Jonas

-- 
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/attachments/20130109/6b4a604e/attachment-0001.pgp>