Bug#694657: closed by Reinhard Tartler <siretart at tauware.de> (Bug#694657: fixed in libav 6:9.1-1)
dr at jones.dk
Wed Jan 9 21:53:48 UTC 2013
Quoting Francesco Poli (2013-01-09 22:08:58)
> On Wed, 9 Jan 2013 21:11:38 +0100 Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 7:18 PM, Francesco Poli
> > > Which license is the libavcodec-extra-* package released under?
> > > LGPL-2.1+ or GPL-2+ ?
> > GPL-3+
> GPL-3+ is the effective license of the binary package.
> My question was "which is the license for the source files which are
> compiled in order to generate that binary package?".
Maybe that is what you _now_ ask or what you _intended_ to ask earlier
on, but what you have inside quotation marks here right above is not
what you quote yourself as having said slightly further up.
[I'll comment on that other post separately]
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
[x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 836 bytes
More information about the pkg-multimedia-maintainers