ntk - review - upload

[Ross Gammon]

On 04/24/2015 05:01 PM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> 
> 
> 2015-04-24 15:39 GMT+02:00 Felipe Sateler <fsateler at debian.org
> <mailto:fsateler at debian.org>>:
> 
>     On 24 April 2015 at 06:30, Jaromír Mikeš <mira.mikes at gmail.com
>     <mailto:mira.mikes at gmail.com>> wrote:

>  
> 
>     >
>     > Would be great if someone can review package and if everything fine upload.
> 
>     I cannot review as I am too short on time. However, if others review
>     and agree that it is OK for upload then I can do the signing/upload.
> 

Hi Felipe & mira,

Finally I had a good chance to review ntk.

I found a few things which I just pushed to alioth:

1. Fixed clean target to remove *.pyc files left behind by waf
2. Switched Vcs URL to cgit
3. Added a README.Debian explaining the waf-light 1.6.11 v 1.8.8 issue
4. Added a gbp.conf file & upstream metadata

Actually, I don't see why it couldn't be released to unstable rather
than experimental as it is NEW anyway and is mainly for use by the other
"non" packages to come. The changelog still says "UNRELEASED".

Looks "good to go" to me!

Cheers,

Ross

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/attachments/20150425/941c46f3/attachment.sig>