ntk - review - upload

Jaromír Mikeš mira.mikes at gmail.com
Sat Apr 25 20:55:40 UTC 2015


2015-04-25 21:53 GMT+02:00 Ross Gammon <ross at the-gammons.net>:

> On 04/24/2015 05:01 PM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> > 2015-04-24 15:39 GMT+02:00 Felipe Sateler <fsateler at debian.org
> > <mailto:fsateler at debian.org>>:
>

Hi Ross,


> >
> >     On 24 April 2015 at 06:30, Jaromír Mikeš <mira.mikes at gmail.com
> >     <mailto:mira.mikes at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> >     > Would be great if someone can review package and if everything
> fine upload.
> >
> >     I cannot review as I am too short on time. However, if others review
> >     and agree that it is OK for upload then I can do the signing/upload.
> >
>
> I found a few things which I just pushed to alioth:
>
> 1. Fixed clean target to remove *.pyc files left behind by waf
> 2. Switched Vcs URL to cgit
> 3. Added a README.Debian explaining the waf-light 1.6.11 v 1.8.8 issue
> 4. Added a gbp.conf file & upstream metadata
>

Thank you for this! Great work:)
I just added .gitignore file which I forgot :(

Actually, I don't see why it couldn't be released to unstable rather
> than experimental as it is NEW anyway and is mainly for use by the other
> "non" packages to come.


I also vote for unstable.


> The changelog still says "UNRELEASED".
>

This is this team habit. It will be changed by person who is really going
to upload just before uploading.
It is nice as you can clearly see what is worked on and what is already
uploaded.

best regards

mira
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/attachments/20150425/7f3b1073/attachment.html>


More information about the pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list