[SCM] x42-plugins/master: Exclude mipsel from build.

Jaromír Mikeš mira.mikes at gmail.com
Thu Jun 18 13:43:25 UTC 2015


2015-06-18 13:26 GMT+02:00 umläute <zmoelnig at umlaeute.mur.at>:
> On 2015-06-18 10:33, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
>> 2015-06-18 9:09 GMT+02:00 "IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU)"
>> <umlaeute at debian.org>:
>>> On 06/18/2015 02:50 AM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
>>>> 2015-06-09 18:20 GMT+02:00 Jaromír Mikeš <mira.mikes at gmail.com>:
>>
>>>>> I asked removal mipsel build
>>>>> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=788231
>>>>> Is it fine just like this or other step is needed?
>>>>
>>>> x42-plugins didn't entered "testing" what to do now?
>>>
>>> just wait?
>>>
>>> #788231 has not been closed yet, so x42-plugins is still listed as
>>> supporting mipsel.
>>>
>>> you also might want to give some more detailed reasoning in the
>>> bug-report, as to why you would like to have mipsel builds removed.
>>> (if stating "FTBFS" were enough, we could just do automatic removal of
>>> archs that fail to bulid, no?)
>>
>> Thank you I added some info ... I am not sure if something extra
>> should be done like removing mipsel build from testing?
>
> isn't that what #788231 is all about?
>
> anyhow, #788210 is tagged as unreproducible, so it might be worth
> digging somemore into the reason why it fails.

Ahh ... I missed answer to this bug ... so it mean it will not be
fixed by g++ maintainers :(
and make things even bit more mysterious.

> a very wild and uneducated check reveals that the build is parallelized
> (DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=parallel=5).
> could that somehow be causing the problem?

x42-plugins not having parallel build enabled ... but it doesn't mean
it is not causing this problem.

> (i'm really just asking; but
> iirc a number of builds failed for with obscure errors do to such problems)

Yes I saw some examples of strange errors too :(

mira



More information about the pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list