hydrogen packaging

[Jaromír Mikeš]

2016-11-27 1:33 GMT+01:00 James Cowgill <jcowgill at debian.org>:
> On 26/11/16 13:39, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
>> 2016-11-26 13:44 GMT+01:00 James Cowgill <jcowgill at debian.org>:
>>> On 26/11/16 02:02, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
>>>> 2016-11-26 0:15 GMT+01:00 James Cowgill <jcowgill at debian.org>:
>>>>> On 25/11/16 17:15, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
>>>>>> 2016-11-25 17:13 GMT+01:00 James Cowgill <jcowgill at debian.org>:
>>>>>>> -- d/hydrogen.install
>>>>>>>> usr/share/hydrogen/data/img
>>>>>>> It seems that the only reason for putting this in hydrogen instead of
>>>>>>> hydrogen-data is the SVG icon?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't think you should ship the entire data/img directory in the
>>>>> hydrogen package just for this. Either only install that one svg and
>>>>> move everything over to the -data package, or duplicate the svg since
>>>>> it's only 9kB.
>>>>
>>>> Ok ... I thought that icon make sense to be installed in binary package
>>>> but as hydrogen package can't be installed without hydrogen-data package
>>>> all img dir is now moved to -data package.
>>>
>>> I agree that putting the icon in the main package does make sense - it
>>> just seemed like a lot of other stuff could have gone in the data
>>> package. One thing is that appstream (ie GNOME software center) requires
>>> the icon to be in the main package so hydrogen won't show up at the moment.
>>
>> Done ;)
>
> What you've done won't work - you've installed the same file into two
> separate packages which have to be installed together.

Now h2-icon.svg file excluded from hydrogen-data package and installed
only in hydrogen package.

mira