[debian-mysql] final decision about MySQL r-deps needed / cleaning up the MySQL mess
Rene Engelhard
rene at debian.org
Mon Oct 17 13:33:29 UTC 2016
Hi Release Team,
I am completely confused and puzzled about the currrent MySQL vs. MariaDB
situation.
There was
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2016/09/msg00000.html
I brought this up in
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-mysql-maint/2016-August/009346.html
and as told that I can continue (build-)depending on libmysqlclient from MySQL.
Especially given
- mysql-connector-c++s upstream is Oracle, so they obviously do not care
about MariaDB and (can) just require MySQL
- mysql-workbench (also Oracle I think) in newer versions apparently needs
mysql-connector-c++ >= 1.1.7
- mysql-connector-c++ starting from 1.1.5 (IIRC) needs MySQL >= 5.6 to build
(and doesn't build with MariaDB) and mysql-connector-c++ 1.1.7 needs even
MySQL >= 5.7
- both LO and MySQL Workbench crash with > 1.1.3 of mysql-connector-c++
at least on i386
(Interestingly, the mysql-workbench "maintainer" didn't do *any* action or
offer to help to fix https://bugs.debian.org/836731, which is why sid
is stuck with 1.1.3)
Now I saw this upload today:
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2016 13:10:56 +0200
Source: mysql-5.7
[..]
Description:
libmysqlclient-dev - MySQL database development files
libmysqlclient20 - MySQL database client library
[...]
Closes: 837883
Changes:
mysql-5.7 (5.7.15-1) unstable; urgency=medium
[...]
which obviously will cause in a (uncoordinated) transition.
While it could be be done, I saw
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-mysql-maint/2016-October/009583.html, which says:
--- snip ---
The release and security teams have decided that MySQL will live only in
unstable for stretch due to the perceived complications with tracking
security patches in MySQL.
--- snip ---
which then also implies mysql-* will be removed which then also implies
thet everything needs to transition away from it or it (will be removed).
This was also said in a discussion on #debian-mysql. Without any acknowlegement
that there should have been more direct communication of what people should do.
So what should a maintainer do?
Remove MySQL dependencies and replace it with MariaDB or it won't be in stretch?
What happens for stuff requring MySQL?
In this specific case, what should I do?
a) keep mysql-connector-c++ built against MySQL? That would mean keeping
mysql-5.7 because of the libreoffice-mysql-connector -> libmysqlcppconnv5 ->
libmysqlclient20 dependency chain.
This would mean I could keep libreoffice-mysql-connector and at some time
in the future mysql-workbench could use this, too
b) build mysql-connector-c++ 1.1.3 against MariaDB? Would work for 1.1.3 (and
probably 1.1.4), but not for anything >= 1.1.5 as that one needs MySQL 5.6
ot even 5.7 to build and subsequently don't build against MariaDB (see
above).
This would mean I could keep libreoffice-mysql-connector but would cause
issues for proper packaging of mysql-workbench. But then again Dmitry
can take it over?
c) drop libreoffice-mysql-connector
(thereoretically there's c0) meaning "use internal mysql-connector-c++ 1.1.4,
which we then could build against MariaDB, but that would introduce usage
of a internal code copy, and I've no idea whether that 1.1.4 build will also
be affected by https://bugs.debian.org/836731. So the "safe" solution would
be c))
Regards,
Rene
More information about the pkg-mysql-maint
mailing list