[Pkg-netatalk-devel] Patching Bullseye

Daniel Markstedt markstedt at gmail.com
Sat Aug 12 22:05:11 BST 2023


Hi Jonas,

I'm having a bit of a downtime with my interviewing / self improvement
this week, so today I got around to start reading the contributor docs
(which I found the URL for) and look closer at the code.
My first conclusion was that we can't use the 3.1.12~ds-9 tag to
iterate on for Bullseye unfortunately:
Bullseye doesn't have tracker3 packages, so the package dependencies
introduced in debian/control throws up a barrier for adoption.
As a side note, 3.1.12~ds-9 is the package version Ubuntu 22.04 uses
as a baseline for their package.

So my conclusion is that working off of 3.1.12~ds-8 is the correct
course of action.
Looking at the pattern used for Buster, I would say that the next tag
for the Bullseye package should be: 3.1.12~ds-8+deb11u1
Let me create a work branch to figure out the changeset, and then tag
it once I'm ready.

Cheers,
Daniel




On Tue, Jul 4, 2023 at 8:49 PM Daniel Markstedt <markstedt at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Jonas,
>
> Now is a good time to look into patching the Bullseye netatalk package, I think!
> We have an upstream patch for this user reported bug ready:
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1040065
>
> With the latest Bullseye package version being 3.1.12~ds-8, I assume I
> should be working on 3.1.12~ds-9 ?
> So: Adding a patch to debian/patches and then updating series... is
> there any other step I should know about?
>
> My apologies if this was covered under some of the URLs you sent me
> months ago... which I can't find right now.
>
> Best,
> Daniel



More information about the pkg-netatalk-devel mailing list