[Pkg-netatalk-devel] 3.1.16~ds-1

[Daniel Markstedt]

Hi Jonas,

I have prepared the code changes for 3.1.16~ds-1, with this changelog:
https://salsa.debian.org/netatalk-team/netatalk/-/blob/debian/latest/debian/changelog

It should be ready for testing, except I think I messed up the pristine tarball delta generation.
The binary delta came out way too large, and debuild complains about binary files that has changed.
So I think I made a mistake somewhere working at this too late at night!

In hindsight I should not have pushed to the pristine-tar remote before fully testing:
https://salsa.debian.org/netatalk-team/netatalk/-/blob/pristine-tar/netatalk_3.1.16~ds.orig.tar.gz.delta
So I guess we may have to revert this and start over. Sorry about the mess!
I'll try to look at it again later in the week.

This is what debuild complains about:
dpkg-source: error: cannot represent change to doc/gfx/logo.png: binary file contents changed
dpkg-source: error: add doc/gfx/logo.png in debian/source/include-binaries if you want to store the modified binary in the debian tarball
dpkg-source: error: cannot represent change to etc/afpd/spotlight-packet.bin: binary file contents changed
dpkg-source: error: add etc/afpd/spotlight-packet.bin in debian/source/include-binaries if you want to store the modified binary in the debian tarball
dpkg-source: error: cannot represent change to etc/afpd/spotlight-packet2.bin: binary file contents changed
dpkg-source: error: add etc/afpd/spotlight-packet2.bin in debian/source/include-binaries if you want to store the modified binary in the debian tarball
dpkg-source: error: unrepresentable changes to source
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-netatalk-devel/attachments/20230912/f5a3364b/attachment.htm>