[pkg-nvidia-devel] separate packages for libGL.* and nvidia_drv.so
Russ Allbery
rra at debian.org
Wed Jun 23 17:06:28 UTC 2010
Andreas Beckmann <debian at abeckmann.de> writes:
> I was thinking again about separating the nvidia Xorg driver from the
> nvidia GL libraries, here are some ideas for package reorganization. If
> there are no objections, I'm going to implement it in a few days.
> nvidia-libgl1${LEGACY}:
> * new package
> * only Recommends: nvidia-kernel${LEGACY}-12.34.56
> (for virtual systems (e.g. jails) without an own kernel that can't
> install a kernel module package but have the kernel module magically
> available) #369316
> * ships libGL.so.* (and the other *.so.* in /usr/lib)
> * transition of the libGL.* diversions to this package is not too
> difficult
> * contains the trigger to create libGL.so
> * we could try a Provides: libgl1 #389971
> nvidia-glx${LEGACY}:
> * contains only the Xorg driver + glx module
> * Depends: nvidia-kernel${LEGACY}-12.34.56 (as it is now)
> * Depends: nvidia-libgl1${LEGACY} (to not change the current behaviour)
> nvidia-libgl1${LEGACY}-dev:
> * renamed from nvidia-glx${LEGACY}-dev, with transitional packages in
> place
> Eventually we could introduce nvidia-libgl1${LEGACY}-ia32, too, to be
> consistent (nvidia-glx-ia32 would become (nearly) empty in that case).
Hm, yes, I don't see anything wrong with that and it seems like a good
idea to me.
--
Russ Allbery (rra at debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
More information about the Pkg-nvidia-devel
mailing list