testing kernel module build in branches/304 and branches/340

[Andreas Beckmann]

On 2016-02-29 17:49, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> So the 304 branch is fine as-is on both architectures, but it's still
> using our conftest.h system. Were you going to backport the changes to
> use upstream's conftest.sh to that branch too?

It looked like that would require significantly more work than 340
(since treats Kbuild more like a non-standard non-default option), so
I'll probably leave it alone, it will be EoL-ed end of next year anyway.
Unless someone comes with a patch of course.


Andreas