testing kernel module build in branches/304 and branches/340

[Luca Boccassi]

On Feb 29, 2016 17:55, "Andreas Beckmann" <anbe at debian.org> wrote:
>
> On 2016-02-29 17:49, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > So the 304 branch is fine as-is on both architectures, but it's still
> > using our conftest.h system. Were you going to backport the changes to
> > use upstream's conftest.sh to that branch too?
>
> It looked like that would require significantly more work than 340
> (since treats Kbuild more like a non-standard non-default option), so
> I'll probably leave it alone, it will be EoL-ed end of next year anyway.
> Unless someone comes with a patch of course.

That's fine, I agree it's a lot of work for little return. There probably
won't be that many 304 releases before it EOLs.

Kind regards,
Luca Boccassi
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-nvidia-devel/attachments/20160229/35ecb582/attachment.html>