Confusion on alternatives for /usr/lib/xorg/modules/linux/libglx.so

[Andreas Beckmann]

On 2018-07-16 07:17, Hualet Wang wrote:
> Thanks for your explanation, Andreas. But I still get further questions
> here:

> On 7/16/18 4:26 AM, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>> On 2018-07-15 09:00, Hualet Wang wrote:
>>> Recently I’m trying port nvidia-prime to our distribution,
>> We might be interested in the result of that project.
>> https://bugs.debian.org/875959
> The progress seems to be very slow?

Rather: noone is working on it.

>> This should be fixed wth 390.67-2.
> We're now on 390.59-2, but we seem to still get this problem, I'll dig
> into it.

That is not the fixed version ...

> I'm wondering which part of code or scripts doing this "manual" work? 
> So I can try to debug the problem on my own :)

See commit d68ecb1bd90c5838bbbfe096e51bcebc09753621
"Manual" as in "we now have to set a value that was previously the default".


Andreas